How to Make Enemies: Anti-terrorism Version

My friend M linked to a letter by Johns Hopkins professor Chris Callison-Burch, addressed to the president of the United States. It concerns the callous way in which the nation’s government took refuge behind bureaucratic opacity to flaunt their racist terror of a Middle-Eastern Muslim man — otherwise known as security ‘profiling’.

Of course, said man might turn out to be vewy vewy dangerous indeed, and oooh, how silly would C-B look then, but if that were indeed the case, then the process by which the US government and their privatised visa process blocked him was doubly stupid, for you do not want to humiliate and antagonise an enemy so potent.

What strikes me most about this incident, however, is the sneaky school-boyish trickery employed by the US Embassy. They lured Omar with the promise of ‘looking into’ the tearing-up of his ticket to US, and the moment he handed them his passport, stamped ‘CANCELLED’ all over it. Gotcha! Hee hee hee!

I wonder if they high-fived each other after he left.

On his return flight back to Baltimore to defend his thesis, he was not allowed to board his plane in Cairo. The flight staff tore up his ticket without explanation. He returned home to Jordan and went to the US embassy where they told him that nothing was wrong with his student visa. A week later, the embassy called him back to say that they had found the problem. They said that if he came in, they would fix it. Instead of fixing it, they stamped CANCELED across his student visa without explaining what was wrong, and refused to answer any questions as to why. They handed him a piece of paper saying that there was no appeal process and that he would have to re-apply for a visa. He did. The interview went perfectly well, but the application remained stuck in \Administrative Processing”. After months of waiting, we finally held his thesis defense via video conferencing, and Johns Hopkins University awarded him his PhD. Omar was unable to participate in the graduation ceremony since he was never allowed to return. Microsoft sought an H1B visa for him, but because of prolonged delays in securing that visa for Omar, the company has given up its efforts and instead placed him in its Cairo.

Omar is exactly the type of person who the US should be actively recruiting to come to the country. [For reasons cited, see the article.]

Postcards from Friends: New English Snow

Seeing my post about New England yearnings, a friend in the area very kindly sent me these two pictures of the last snowstorm that was mentioned in the comment section of the yearn-post.

I’m very touched. Isn’t it sweet to be in people’s thoughts? And isn’t technology a wonderful thing?

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

New England, New England

For all that it is a beastly cold place (8 inches of snow and counting, says my old mate Tegan) and people don’t know what to do with their lovely seafood (boiled and dipped in butter. I ask you!), I rather like New England. And I rather miss it. There’s something about the blizzards and snow drift and constant rain that casts a charm. I’m damned if I know what it is exactly, but whatever it is, I miss it. Oh, Boston. You pretty, pretty thing. I wish I were back amongst your lovely old red brick.

Incidentally, Boston was also where I bought my first camera. I was a bloody awful photographer then, brand new and with no idea how to point it and what to shoot. ‘Still’, you might say, ‘you recorded all your happy memories. That counts for something!’ Hah. If only. By stupidity and sloppiness, I have since permanently deleted two years’ worth of photograhps from my hard drive. Many tears were spent over that spilt milk, I can tell you.

However! Praise be social media, I had uploaded a few of those pictures on Facebook. Not the best ones, just ones recording the first snow, the first snowman, and so on. Since I’m mourning the crisp coldness of those  New England mornings, glinting around the edges after a cleansing snow-storm, here is a set reminiscent of those days. Forgive the rank amateurness of the shots.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

A Valentine for Her Gay Ex-Husband

My country is mired in blood and secrecy at the moment. None of it has touched us personally — for we are the invincible urban middle-class, flayed by the market and government and social systems every day but alive till the end like cockroaches — except the fear that our streets might suddenly burst into riots.

Speaking of love in such circs might reek of pink escapsim, but speaking of this love isn’t.

This love speaks of people whose very existence was mired in blood and secrecy. It speaks of friendship, loyalty, dignity, and freedom. It is beauty carved of steel, and decorated with hope.

Read the full article here. If it makes you want to cry, let yourself. Some things deserve the validation of your tears: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/judith-newton/gay-husband-valentine_b_2641159.html

It was the middle-sixties, and homosexuality was still widely regarded as a neurosis, and my own ignorance was profound. But most importantly, I wanted to believe that therapy would be the “cure,” because I felt with him what I had longed to feel for most of my existence — happy, valued, loved, secure, at home.

[...]

After he began his sexual journey, we both fell in love with other men, but within two years, we were living as roommates and would continue to do so for the next 10 years. “If ever two people were made for each other,” we said, “it’s us.”

He met another man; I met another man too. Mine came to live with me. And Dick. I married my new man — with many second thoughts — and the three of us moved to a three-story Victorian house, ideal for sharing. When my daughter was born the following summer, life felt complete.

[A year later] On Thanksgiving morning, as we held hands, he died. [Of AIDS.] He was 46.

Perhaps the story of our love belongs to the 1960s, when everything seemed possible, a spirit we never lost. Had we come to each other in the 1970s, our marriage might never have taken place because in the 1970s, the lines between gay and straight were strictly drawn. But had we met in the 2010s, who knows? Genders, sexualities and modes of attachments have multiplied and blossomed and anything is possible today. In honor of him, I want to celebrate the day of romance with a Valentine that honors the many kinds of love that are in the offing — if we are flexible and creative enough to make them work, and if, in the end, we are open to possibility.

 

The English Colonial (1)

Just this morning at work, we had a bit of a scuffle over language.  Well, I say scuffle. My colleagues are mostly too darling to get into one of those. Honest ideological debates blazing righteous jargon and statistics, yes. Certainly. Twice before lunch, if you like. Scuffly fightypaws, not so much.

This morning’s first contention was ‘skejool’. In a flow, my boss said, “We will finalise the schedule… I mean, the skejool, and then mail you the details, all right?”. “Would you mind terribly if we stick to ‘schedule’?”, I asked, big puppy eyes. “No no”, he said. “Not at all! I’d really much rather. But isn’t ‘skedewl’ or ‘skejool’ what everybody says these days?”

And there’s the catch right there. Everybody’s says new stuff, because everybody else, apparently, is saying it too. When we were in school, we tried that tack often to wriggle out of old-school ‘disciplining’: ‘But miss, my friend/everyone was doing it too!’. ‘Miss’, however, would merely fix us with a Look (sometimes one of suppressed delight), and say, “If everybody jumped off a building, would you jump off one too? If your friends bit a mad dog, would you bite a mad dog too? Don’t talk back and hold out your palm!”. And that was that.

Such misses, alas, are in short supply these days, and hence ‘schedules’ are fast shifting to ‘skejool’, ‘maths’ to ‘math’, ‘mobile phones’ to  ‘cell phones’ — and so on, and so forth — with no real reason except that other people, people with fairer skin than ours, say them such. The conversation, therefore, simmered a good ten minutes in the hot Old Colonisation vs. New Colonisation debate, before branching off into the tragedy that is the evolution of Hindustani — the musical, poetic, accessible Hindustani — into the stilted, inorganic ‘Sanskritised’ Hindi and Persianised Urdu. Words to the tune of ‘jumped-up’, ‘pompous’, ‘pretentious’, ‘arriviste’ and ‘slave-mentality’ were liberally used.

In the end, we all decided we needed a cup of tea.

Couple of hours later, strolling idly through online dictionaries in an effort to stave off meeting a deadline, I discovered that while ‘pompous’, ‘pretentious’, ‘arriviste’ and so on were adequately addressed by the archive, thesaurus.com — whose default spellings are American — defines ‘jumped-up’ thus: “move upwards; ascend”. Amongst the synonyms it offers are: ‘climb’, ‘boost’, ‘disappear’, ‘pick up’, ‘soar’, and ‘vanish’.

Dear gods in heaven. Talk about an illustrative example.

US 2012

You may continue to call Mr. O. Prez.

Yay.

[Although really, my happiness is about Rom. not winning, not Ob. not losing]

However, on a FAR sweeter note… Elizabeth Warren wins! Massachusetts is wrested back from the inexplicable Scott Brown! Oh, sweet sighs of relief. I’d have hated to have gone back to a Republican United States, however little actual difference there remains between the Reds and Blues policy-wise (especially health and foreign policy-wise).

But. Senator Warren. Now there’s someone I’d much rather call Madame P.

(But alas. That darling day is never to be :( )

 

What to do when you’ve borrowed a laptop to finish impending work.

You go on Youtube and indulge your obsession with linguistic culture.

That’s right. Both my laptops conked out most mysteriously within ten minutes of each other, reducing me to lugging the heavy, useless lumps of plastic and metal under the sun all afternoon, only to be told by service centre folks that nothing can be done about them for a month at least, so would madam please lug them right back home, thank you?

What with impending deadlines, I then did what sensible opportunists would do: I hopped to my buddy K’s house, and commandeered her laptop to work. Only, of course, I went on Youtube instead, and given my current Torchwood haze, looked up John Barrowman speaking in his lovely Scottish accent. Have you heard him switch right in the middle of a sentence? Damn, he’s good.

Share the joy!

The Whispering Death (of Cricket)

This picture and caption is from my Facebook notifications this afternoon.

[This is] Michael Holding. Actually, Brian Close’s chest, after a Michael Holding delivery crashed into it at Old Trafford, 1976. Holding was called ‘[The] Whispering Death’ as the umpires kept looking over their shoulders to see if he was coming – they couldn’t hear him, he was so fast, so liquid. Fast bowling is on the decline, thanks to TV and betting – the mob would rather see (and bet on) a six from a tailender than a fast bowler running through a team. And quickies need 5 days to display the depth of their powers, not 20 overs. RIP.

There are two things about this picture that I must say.

One, Brian Close was in his forties when he faced the terrifying Holding and the rest of the 70′s Windies pace-attack. ‘Forbidding’ doesn’t begin to describe them. Holding his own against them despite a steady battering, is both brave and remarkable, especially for a batsman of Close’s limited capability.

Second, images and videos from that era, till about the end of the last decade, appear to me to be subtextual eulogies to the game of cricket, as it was. Those happy days of skill and glory, I am fairly certain, will never be here again, despite higher delivery speeds in a few contemporary fast bowlers. Never, that is, unless one holds the BCCI down by the scruff of its neck, and forces a structure that demands transparency, descipline, technique and talent back into both international and national formats of the game.

In other words, and to repeat myself, happy days will never be here again.

Sour-grapes Grinchiness?

It’s not that I love the hit-and-miss days of inadequate protective gear and killing pitches without reservation. I’ve never been one for the thrill of the killing fields. Neither am I the mealy-mouthed grinch who wants young cricketers to be deprived of obscenely high remunerations (although I do have a few sharp things to say when public funds are redirected to congratulatory gifts for them). But as someone that money is eventually being made off, I would like to get some bang for my buck. You know? Some actual cricket in my matches. If that isn’t too much to ask for. Tests, I may literally no longer have time for, but I certainly miss the pleasure of watching clever field placements, well-thought-out bowling attacks, and shrewdly-amassed innings that even a decent fifty-overs’ match offers.

Twenty20s, on the other hand, are primarily a great deal of flash and jump at the fringes of the actual game. It is also the most obscene spectacle of blatant flesh-trading I’ve ever seen, and I speak as one who has watched post-election MP-trading in India for years.

Had this hobson-jobsoning amounted to something worthwhile for the audience, I’d have kept shut. Hell, more power to players who can make teams run after them with bundles of cash and incentives, by sheer dint of performance (and a great agent). But the prime function of the Twenty20s, sportswise, appears to be squishing talent and skill out of the young pool, by de-incentivising actual performance over mere inclusion or on-field appearance. And that’s to speak nothing of the betting and fixing.

The Popularity Myth

Supporters of the format, however, keep telling me not to be such a stick in the mud, because Twenty20 has done the near-impossible. It has brought popularity back to the game. It has made cricket fashionable again.

Which is a lovely warm plate of dee-licious tripe.

First, as I’ve verbosely underlined above, I’m actively discouraged from considering this form of the game ‘real’ cricket at all, by virtue of its practice of rewarding parody-like playing skills. But one might dismiss this as a subjective opinion. Very well then. Second, despite the IPL being one of the most valuable sporting franchise in the world, I haven’t noticed global interest in the game spike noticeably since it kicked off. Have you? Weren’t Japan, Spain, Uzbekistan, and China pitching teams for a World Championship event last April? No? Oh ahh, I must be thinking of figure skating. [In the ICC World Cup last April, 14 teams qualified. In the 2011 World Figure Skating Championships last April, disrupted by the Tokyo quakes and shifted to Moscow at the last minute, 44 countries competed. And this is a game whose spread is limited by the availability of ice.]

I rest my case. Or no, hang on, I don’t.

Esprit de Corps [or, the Cricket-Zombie]

The whole thing about cricket being a gentleman’s game has taken quite a beating since postcol. times, since the conflation of ‘gentleman’ with ‘white man of birth and means’ (or simply ‘white man’ in the settle colonies like Australia and New Zealand) was challenged by teams from the subcontinent and the West Indies. But there was still a certain code to the game, overt racism and Bodylines notwithstanding. The definition of masculinity was somewhat different. There also wasn’t this degree of access to disposable income and the power of celebrity — and yes, I do keep in mind the feminine personal effects thrown at the 70′s and 80′s stars sometimes, possibly by women (and some men) who hadn’t watched a full day’s match in their lives.

Lately, however, manipulating media and the commodities market to let popularity for the game be centred completely on personas and not their cricketing abilities has, to my mind, given rise to rather a dangerous culture of entitled little boys with their own clean-up crews, eager to piss on hoi-polloi who give them so much and demand so little in return. Largely because they can. Although I’m told it’s a rigorous game in it’s own way, the reason I can’t bring myself to like American football, for instance, is because to someone standing outside the culture, it looks exactly like contemporary T20 cricket will look like in half a decade’s time: a bullies coterie of spoilt little boys, hiding behind masses of padding just to play rough rugby on field, and swanning about like frat boys with a party-pass to the whole world beyond it.

Quite apart from the ridiculous immaturity and insecurity it radiates, the layers of physical and legal protection, coupled with artificially-pumped adrenalin and testosterone levels around this new culture of games, take the sporstman spirit right out of it, and makes it a diminished-responsibility chest-thumping arena for mentally lazy shows of arrogance and shallow aggression.

It isn’t a pretty picture. And it’s got claws.

How Not to Clear American Customs

This anecdote is from an email-blog my friend M sends out on days we are lucky. M is a delight to read, and I want to quote his posts frequently, but my native lassitude gets in the way of all that onerous copying and pasting.

The anecdote he recounted this morning, however, was far too amusing — and terrifying — not to share. Especially since it fulfils the prediction he had made about his return to the US exactly.  “If I land in a kurta”, M had said, “I will definitely be pulled out for further questioning”. And he was.

Indices are scary things.

[For reference, M is what is colloquially referred to as 'white', and has grown up to a large extent in the United States.]

Reached Boston airport Tuesday evening, walked into the customs hall. The two people on the plane selected for extra enquiries were me and the one brown-skinned man in the crowd. Agents plying the queue swooped on each of us. Mine asked for my documents, then, “Where’d you get that shirt? India? Pakistan?”

“I got it at Gariahat in Kolkata, India.”

“What do you do?”

“I’m a neuroscientist at the University of Cambridge.” This is nominally true, as I do hold a visiting appointment there – and trying to explain the whole truth that I recently completed an appointment in India and have an offer from Uni X but have been shortlisted at Uni Y, well, such complexity would only get me into trouble. One of the practical facts that I learnt in India is that the story most consistent with appearances can be more important and more effective than the actual facts – especially when dealing with the authorities.

“I thought it had to be some kind of government work,” said the agent, handing back the passports.

Welcome to America, where if mainstream behaviour isn’t your ambition then there’s something wrong with you, because to be truly democratic is to be truly average.

 

(I should add here that as a brown woman in jeans and a kurta, I’ve never been held up.)

American Mawkishness

I just plain don’t understand why some progressive Americans — especially those from the white middle-class — are twisting in paroxsyms of agonied astonishment that their media is refusing to portray white supremacist Wade Michael Page’s Gurudwara slaughter-fest as an act of terror.

For gods’ bleeding sake, people, what’s the big mystery here? Your country, just like every single other country in the world, is a deeply racist collective run by power-mad bastards. You folks just like to delude yourselves more than most. Snap out of it. Stop bleating like bewildered baa-lambs lost in cyberspace. Grow a spine and accept the truth about your nation and yourselves.

And it might, just might, set you free.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 558 other followers

%d bloggers like this: